Fair Use: Obama Poster Follow Up

Thursday, February 26th, 2009
Hope - Obama by Steve Rhodes

Hope - Obama by Steve Rhodes

Just about two weeks ago we wrote about the legal case around the image the iconic Obama hope poster was created from. It is an issue of what constitutes fair use, and what is copyright infringement.

This issue alone could cost a church millions of dollars if ignored. Thankfully fellow bloggers over at Church Marketing Sucks came out with a three part series on fair use, from a Copyright Lawyer Richard Byrd.

Check out each of the three parts:


Ad Busting in Public

Tuesday, February 10th, 2009

While much of the public understands that photographs are touched up, the extent to which this happens is widely not understood. Someone over in Germany created these photo shop posters and plastered them over the top of a CD advertisement for Britney Spears, Leona Lewis, and Christina Aguilera.

Check out some of the photos below.

(more…)


Response to ‘Jesus is not a Brand’ in CT

Friday, January 2nd, 2009

Christianity Today posted an article by Tyler Wigg-Stevenson today titled “Jesus is not a Brand“. He basically explains over 8 pages that because the message and hope of Christ is so superior to that of our consumerist culture that we should handle this message in a special way. In more or less terms, he plays the God card and tells us that it’s blasphemy to market Jesus/Church/Christianity (on the middle of page 4).

Tyler Wigg-Stevenson’s Argument

His four main points boil down into (in my summary):

  1. The christian life is about Grace and Love not your personal goals, so we can’t sell you something to help you attain your goals.
  2. Since consumerism is based on perpetuating discontentment and satisfaction from new purchases, marketing the church follows the same model. This doesn’t reflect the biblical push to find contentment in God alone (IE not needing anything but God for our contentment).
  3. Brand Relativism (um, commonly known as Brand Affiliation or Brand Association) leads people to believe that something is better than something else when they are just cars, cities, and computers. The only difference is preference. Thus ‘spiritual shoppers’ think of Christianity as only one option among many.
  4. Fragmentation/Niches that are the focus of marketing campaigns are the reason for the distention and lack of unity in the church. Because we market to individual groups in relevant ways (that likely don’t appeal to everyone) we are conforming to the pattern of the world.

His conclusion cutting it down, but never the less in his words.

Consumerism is here to stay. The habits described above—self-creation, discontent, relativism, fragmentation—will become more dominant, not less, in years to come. That’s the way of the globalized economy and ascendant transnational commercial interests. We cannot defeat our situation; we can only seek to live faithfully in it…

But problems begin when we define the church as a whole using a comparison that just describes one of its attributes: i.e., treating the church as a business with a brand to promote. And then, even though there are all sorts of ways the church isn’t like a business, we begin to employ all the tools of commercial enterprise as though we were paying the body of Christ some compliment by treating it like a Fortune 500 company, with a bottom line, investor returns, supply chain, CEOS, market share, and so on. If we treat the gospel like a commodity, can we fault nonbelievers for thinking that the cross is just another logo?

My Response

While I have loads to say about his 8 page article, I will be brief, if anyone wishes me to write more on any point please simply ask in the comments section.

(more…)