<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Marketing and Management Thoughts &#187; FCC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nineteen05.insightsforchurch.com/tag/fcc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nineteen05.insightsforchurch.com</link>
	<description>Helping the Church to think through the less Spiritual sides of Ministry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 20:44:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Future of the Internet looks&#8230;. Good</title>
		<link>http://nineteen05.insightsforchurch.com/2009/03/06/future-of-the-internet-looks-good/</link>
		<comments>http://nineteen05.insightsforchurch.com/2009/03/06/future-of-the-internet-looks-good/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 18:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Prins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julius Genachowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Neutrailty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neutrality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nineteen05.insightsforchurch.com/?p=357</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://nineteen05.insightsforchurch.com/files/2009/03/juliusgenachowski.jpg" rel="lightbox[357]"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-358" src="http://nineteen05.insightsforchurch.com/files/2009/03/juliusgenachowski.jpg" alt="Julius Genachowski" width="250" height="333" /></a>On Tuesday this week (3/3/09) President Obama <a href="http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-288990A1.pdf">nominated</a> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julius_Genachowski">Julius Genachowski</a> as new Chairman for the <a href="http://www.fcc.gov/">FCC</a>. While normally this would be of little importance or interest to the Church this time around it should be. With the issue of <a href="http://nineteen05.insightsforchurch.com/2008/07/29/what-is-net-neutrality-why-should-you-care/">Net Neutrality</a> (allowing companies to charge for bandwidth placement) that could potentially destroy the ability of any ministry to have a dynamic website.</p>
<p>We can let a big sigh of relief, for now anyway. The Obama nomination of Genachowski is seen as someone who will maintain and push forward the democratization of the Internet.</p>
<p><span id="more-357"></span>John Silver, executive director of <a href="http://www.freepress.net/">Free Press</a> said:</p>
<blockquote><p>We share Obama&#8217;s goals of creating a more diverse, democratic media system and providing fast, affordable, open Internet access for everyone. We greatly look forward to working with Mr. Genachowski to put the president-elect&#8217;s plan into action.</p>
<p style="text-align: right">Via <a href="http://www.tvweek.com/news/2009/01/genachowski_tipped_as_next_fcc.php">TV Week</a></p>
</blockquote>
<p>On the issue of net neutrality</p>
<blockquote><p>The nomination of Genachowski as chairman was widely anticipated and quickly applauded by proponents of net neutrality, who hope an Obama FCC will move decisively to limit what telecoms can and cannot do with internet traffic on their networks.</p>
<p style="text-align: right">via <a href="http://blog.wired.com/business/2009/03/obama-nominates.html">Wired</a></p>
</blockquote>
<div style="display:block"><small><em></em></small></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://nineteen05.insightsforchurch.com/files/2009/03/juliusgenachowski.jpg" rel="lightbox[357]"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-358" src="http://nineteen05.insightsforchurch.com/files/2009/03/juliusgenachowski.jpg" alt="Julius Genachowski" width="250" height="333" /></a>On Tuesday this week (3/3/09) President Obama <a href="http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-288990A1.pdf">nominated</a> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julius_Genachowski">Julius Genachowski</a> as new Chairman for the <a href="http://www.fcc.gov/">FCC</a>. While normally this would be of little importance or interest to the Church this time around it should be. With the issue of <a href="http://nineteen05.insightsforchurch.com/2008/07/29/what-is-net-neutrality-why-should-you-care/">Net Neutrality</a> (allowing companies to charge for bandwidth placement) that could potentially destroy the ability of any ministry to have a dynamic website.</p>
<p>We can let a big sigh of relief, for now anyway. The Obama nomination of Genachowski is seen as someone who will maintain and push forward the democratization of the Internet.</p>
<p><span id="more-357"></span>John Silver, executive director of <a href="http://www.freepress.net/">Free Press</a> said:</p>
<blockquote><p>We share Obama&#8217;s goals of creating a more diverse, democratic media system and providing fast, affordable, open Internet access for everyone. We greatly look forward to working with Mr. Genachowski to put the president-elect&#8217;s plan into action.</p>
<p style="text-align: right">Via <a href="http://www.tvweek.com/news/2009/01/genachowski_tipped_as_next_fcc.php">TV Week</a></p>
</blockquote>
<p>On the issue of net neutrality</p>
<blockquote><p>The nomination of Genachowski as chairman was widely anticipated and quickly applauded by proponents of net neutrality, who hope an Obama FCC will move decisively to limit what telecoms can and cannot do with internet traffic on their networks.</p>
<p style="text-align: right">via <a href="http://blog.wired.com/business/2009/03/obama-nominates.html">Wired</a></p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nineteen05.insightsforchurch.com/2009/03/06/future-of-the-internet-looks-good/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Net Neutrality: FCC Strikes down Comcast!</title>
		<link>http://nineteen05.insightsforchurch.com/2008/08/01/net-neutrality-fcc-strikes-down-comcast/</link>
		<comments>http://nineteen05.insightsforchurch.com/2008/08/01/net-neutrality-fcc-strikes-down-comcast/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 19:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Prins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Neutrality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[p2p]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Throttling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nineteen05.com/?p=32</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://nineteen05.insightsforchurch.com/files/2008/07/net-neutrality.jpg" rel="lightbox[26]"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-24" src="http://nineteen05.insightsforchurch.com/files/2008/07/net-neutrality.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="169" /></a>In a 3-2 ruling this morning out in California the FCC ruled against Comcast in one of the first (if not the first) rulings of its kind by a government regulator body.</p>
<p>While there are concerns that the FCC even is involved (could this lead to future regulation and restrictions. This is yet to be seen.) this is a good step for those of us desiring a free and open Internet.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/08/fcc-declares-co.html">Wired Magazine</a> | <a href="http://www.alleyinsider.com/2008/8/comcast-slapped-by-fcc-expands-testing-new-network-management-system-cmcsa-">Silicon Alley Insider</a> coverage of the ruling.</p>
<p>Some notable quotes:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>From the FCC Statement:</strong><br />
Comcast&#8217;s practices are not minimally intrusive, as the company claims, but rather are invasive and have significant effects.  The commission found that Comcast monitors its customers&#8217; connections using deep packet inspection and then determines how it will route some connections based not on their destinations but on their contents. In essence, Comcast opens its customers&#8217; mail because it wants to deliver mail not based on the address on the envelope but on the type of letter contained therein.</p>
<p>Comcast may have interfered with up to three-quarters of all peer-to-peer connections in certain communities. The commission concluded that the end result of Comcast&#8217;s conduct was the blocking of internet traffic, which had the effect of substantially impeding consumers&#8217; ability to access the content and to use the applications of their choice.</p>
<p><strong>From Comcast after the Ruling:</strong><br />
Comcast spokesman Sena Fitzmaurice said the company was &#8220;gratified that the commission did not find any conduct by Comcast that justified a fine.&#8221; He said the company did not throttle traffic.</p></blockquote>
<p>Reading the Statement from FCC above is very scary, that an ISP is reading everything coming to your account. Could they be storing this information, such as credit card information or sensitive company documents.</p>
<p>Unfortunately there was not a fine involved, it would have sent a louder message to all the ISPs out there. For the time being Net Neutrality is still standing here in the USA</p>
<p>*Sigh of Relief*</p>
<div style="display:block"><small><em></em></small></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://nineteen05.insightsforchurch.com/files/2008/07/net-neutrality.jpg" rel="lightbox[26]"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-24" src="http://nineteen05.insightsforchurch.com/files/2008/07/net-neutrality.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="169" /></a>In a 3-2 ruling this morning out in California the FCC ruled against Comcast in one of the first (if not the first) rulings of its kind by a government regulator body.</p>
<p>While there are concerns that the FCC even is involved (could this lead to future regulation and restrictions. This is yet to be seen.) this is a good step for those of us desiring a free and open Internet.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/08/fcc-declares-co.html">Wired Magazine</a> | <a href="http://www.alleyinsider.com/2008/8/comcast-slapped-by-fcc-expands-testing-new-network-management-system-cmcsa-">Silicon Alley Insider</a> coverage of the ruling.</p>
<p>Some notable quotes:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>From the FCC Statement:</strong><br />
Comcast&#8217;s practices are not minimally intrusive, as the company claims, but rather are invasive and have significant effects.  The commission found that Comcast monitors its customers&#8217; connections using deep packet inspection and then determines how it will route some connections based not on their destinations but on their contents. In essence, Comcast opens its customers&#8217; mail because it wants to deliver mail not based on the address on the envelope but on the type of letter contained therein.</p>
<p>Comcast may have interfered with up to three-quarters of all peer-to-peer connections in certain communities. The commission concluded that the end result of Comcast&#8217;s conduct was the blocking of internet traffic, which had the effect of substantially impeding consumers&#8217; ability to access the content and to use the applications of their choice.</p>
<p><strong>From Comcast after the Ruling:</strong><br />
Comcast spokesman Sena Fitzmaurice said the company was &#8220;gratified that the commission did not find any conduct by Comcast that justified a fine.&#8221; He said the company did not throttle traffic.</p></blockquote>
<p>Reading the Statement from FCC above is very scary, that an ISP is reading everything coming to your account. Could they be storing this information, such as credit card information or sensitive company documents.</p>
<p>Unfortunately there was not a fine involved, it would have sent a louder message to all the ISPs out there. For the time being Net Neutrality is still standing here in the USA</p>
<p>*Sigh of Relief*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nineteen05.insightsforchurch.com/2008/08/01/net-neutrality-fcc-strikes-down-comcast/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Net Neutrality: Lawyers already Crying Foul</title>
		<link>http://nineteen05.insightsforchurch.com/2008/08/01/net-neutrality-lawyers-already-crying-foul/</link>
		<comments>http://nineteen05.insightsforchurch.com/2008/08/01/net-neutrality-lawyers-already-crying-foul/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 15:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Prins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[church web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[limiting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Neutrality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wired]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nineteen05.com/?p=30</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://nineteen05.insightsforchurch.com/files/2008/07/net-neutrality.jpg" rel="lightbox[24]"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-24" src="http://nineteen05.insightsforchurch.com/files/2008/07/net-neutrality.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="169" /></a>The ruling isn&#8217;t in yet but the lawyers for Comcast are already crying foul.</p>
<blockquote><p>At least one lawmaker is already crying foul over Friday&#8217;s expected Federal Communications Commission&#8217;s censure of Comcast for faking internet traffic to limit its customers&#8217; peer-to-peer file sharing.</p>
<p>Republican minority leader Rep. John Boehner said the FCC would be &#8220;essentially regulating the internet.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/07/lawmaker-crying.html">Read more via Wired Magazine</a></p>
<p>Will get more as the ruling comes out.</p>
<div style="display:block"><small><em></em></small></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://nineteen05.insightsforchurch.com/files/2008/07/net-neutrality.jpg" rel="lightbox[24]"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-24" src="http://nineteen05.insightsforchurch.com/files/2008/07/net-neutrality.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="169" /></a>The ruling isn&#8217;t in yet but the lawyers for Comcast are already crying foul.</p>
<blockquote><p>At least one lawmaker is already crying foul over Friday&#8217;s expected Federal Communications Commission&#8217;s censure of Comcast for faking internet traffic to limit its customers&#8217; peer-to-peer file sharing.</p>
<p>Republican minority leader Rep. John Boehner said the FCC would be &#8220;essentially regulating the internet.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/07/lawmaker-crying.html">Read more via Wired Magazine</a></p>
<p>Will get more as the ruling comes out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nineteen05.insightsforchurch.com/2008/08/01/net-neutrality-lawyers-already-crying-foul/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
